<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making my (collaborative) butter sculptures of history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://makinghistorypodcast.com/2008/12/05/making-my-collaborative-butter-sculptures-of-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://makinghistorypodcast.com/2008/12/05/making-my-collaborative-butter-sculptures-of-history/</link>
	<description>The Blog for Making History Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:37:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt b</title>
		<link>http://makinghistorypodcast.com/2008/12/05/making-my-collaborative-butter-sculptures-of-history/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>matt b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://makinghistorypodcast.com/?p=165#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Collaboration&#039;s difficult, particularly 1) because the task of writing is such a solitary one - unlike scientific experimentation, and 2)history is so impressionistic that two different people can look at the same evidence and come up with three interpretations.

I&#039;ve collaborated on two papers (with the same person), and in both cases one person did a bulk of the writing, and the other offered heavy revision suggestions.  The benefits of sharing sources and cross-fertilizing with ideas are real, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collaboration&#8217;s difficult, particularly 1) because the task of writing is such a solitary one &#8211; unlike scientific experimentation, and 2)history is so impressionistic that two different people can look at the same evidence and come up with three interpretations.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve collaborated on two papers (with the same person), and in both cases one person did a bulk of the writing, and the other offered heavy revision suggestions.  The benefits of sharing sources and cross-fertilizing with ideas are real, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
