- An interactive view of the 1918 flu pandemic. Scrolling through this site is a painless way to learn about the impact of the disease, yet I found myself wondering if there could’ve have been graphical representations showing the scope of influenza to augment the vintage images and news accounts. Also, the site navigation moved a bit too slowly to be highly engaging. This vid about XDR-TB was far more emotionally effective even though it offers scant information about the disease itself.
- A tribute to Studs Terkel (a hero of mine) and a challenge for everyman to become an oral historian.
- I haven’t yet tested Zotero 1.5, but I’m thrilled about the promise of its sync feature as I weary of transferring zotero files from my research laptop (an AUSU UMPC
) to my home computer.
- My teenage kids think Sarah Vowell
is far more entertaining than any of the other historian podcasters they’ve listened to (including, of course, their Mom). So we’ll be tuning in to Sarah’s take on the Puritans this week as we bake our pumpkin pies (from scratch, of course, because there’s nothing better than a homemade pumpkin pie!)
November 24, 2008
Inspiration Points: Links
November 18, 2007
Academic Blogging
To blog or not to blog? Will it hurt or enhance a career? In what ways can it augment academic book sales and foster community?
Adam Kotsko’s (tongue in cheek) reply:
The monograph: dead. The peer-reviewed journal: dead. The classroom: dead. Only blogging can guarantee the future of academic discourse, and indeed it is the only thing keeping it alive in the present! Open up your eyes, people! Look around you! Everywhere you look: blogs, beautiful blogs! Our blogs will give us tenure. Our blogs will give us cultural relevance. Our blogs will help us get the attention of that girl from college who was really cool but only seemed to want to date assholes. And if we manage to get into a flamewar along the way, all to the good.
Some links to discussions about academic blogging:
- Joseph Kugelmass from The Valve on the questions raised by academic blogging.
- An enthusiastic view of academic blogging at Inside Higher Ed.
- Bitch PhD on the risks of academic blogging and the value of pseudonymity.
- The Scholar and Feminist Online with an issue on Blogging Feminism, with its affiliated blog discussion.
- UC Davis’ panel discussion on “Historical Scholarship and the New Media.”
- An issue of Lore (an e-journal for teachers of writing) centered on the topic of Academic Blogging
- The Chronicle of Higher Eduction’s perspective.
- AcademicBlog wiki’s listing of History Blogs.
- Critical Mass on the perils of academic blogging, a cautionary tale based on the experience of the Phantom Professor.
- Adam Kotsko (see quotation above), writing on his weariness with academic blogging at Inside Higher Ed.
November 13, 2007
“Writing History” Seminar: Studying the craft of historical writing
This quarter I’m taking a seminar called “Writing History” with Jeffrey Wasserstrom, author of China’s Brave New World. The aim of the class (from the syllabus) is to “explore the qualities of historical writing as writing and to see whether doing so can help those taking the class become better, or at least more versatile, authors of pieces about the past.”
Some questions that we are addressing via the readings:
- How do those writing about the past convey what they have learned and the arguments they want to make?
- What rhetorical devices do they use to try to enlighten, capture the attention of, provoke, persuade, or even amuse their reader?
- Why do we think of some academic historians as especially good stylists or practitioners of the craft of historical writing?
- What place, if any, should there be in non-fiction historical writing for techniques and approaches more often associated with one or another genre of fiction?
- Why do some book reviews stick with us while others are immediately forgettable?
Below are the texts that we’re reading for the seminar (with hyperlinks). The books were all paired with relevant readings on the class syllabus. However, for ease of posting here, I’ve disrupted the connections and chronology. Many apologies to Jeff in this regard.
It’s my hope that this list, and other material at the Making History site, will be a catalyst for future classes on the craft of writing history, particularly experimental history:
Books:
Robert Darnton’s The Great Cat Massacre
Vanessa Schwartz’ Spectacular Realities
Erik Larson’s Devil in the White City
Mary Beard’s The Parthenon
Natalie Z. Davis’ The Return of Martin Guerre
Jonathan Spence’s The Death of Woman Wang
Lynn Hunt’s Inventing Human Rights
Amartya Sen’s The Argumentative Indian
Perry Anderson’s Spectrum
Articles:
Urban History, “Icons” issue multimedia companion
Mike Davis’ “The Flames of New York”
Jane Kamensky’s “Our Buildings, Our Selves“
Laura Mitchell’s “Beyond Tense: Encouraging Historians to Think Hard about Writing and Reading“
Martha Hodes’ “A House in Vermont, a Caribbean Beach: Beckoned by landscapes beyond the archive“
Jon Wiener’s “The Weatherman’s Temptation“
Mary Beard’s “A Don’s Life” blogposts
Hanchao Lu’s “The Art of History: A Conversation with Jonathan Spence“
Greg Grandin’s “Toward a Global New Deal”
Jill Lepore’s “No More Kings“
Martha Nussbaum’s “Body of the Nation”
Pankaj Mishra’s “Impasse in India”