THE PAST’S DIGITAL PRESENCE
Saturday, February 20
The Digital Age Library
Room 208
This study elucidates insights pertaining to source format; that is, the virtues of using both original and digital versions of documents. Drawing on experience from the seemingly disparate disciplines of academic research and library archivist, this juxtaposition of mindsets is resolved such that an argument is made for researchers to cull numerous benefits from inhabiting the cataloger’s schema, including an overall bolstering of academic strength.
During the past decade electronic texts and resources have become increasingly accepted by academic libraries, resulting in a shift away from print resources. The view presented by both the American and Canadian Library Associations (ALA, CLA) is that electronic means is a more effective format for the publication, control, dissemination, accessibility, and preservation of information. The rise of the digital format has led to a number of changes in how libraries manage, approach and disseminate information, which has potential consequences that are as yet largely unstudied. This paper investigates why the shift from print to digital media is taking place and what implications it has for academic libraries. In particular, this paper examines the rationale provided by several Canadian university libraries for facilitating the shift toward digital resources and for justifying the costs of the transition. In order to provide a representative cross-section of Ontario university libraries, this study focuses primarily on the library policies and budgets of the University of Toronto (Medical-Doctoral), the University of Guelph (Comprehensive), and Trent University (Primarily Undergraduate). The results indicate that, in general, not a lot is known about how the transition toward digital resources will affect information, libraries, and technology. This shift is problematic because different disciplines and faculties within the academic community do not use, research, or require materials and mediums in the same way. The reality is that many of the premises and assumptions behind the shift to digital acquisitions and resources are either suspect or invalid when it comes to maintaining an acceptable standard for humanities and social science research. As a result, a substantial change in how humanities and social sciences research can be conducted will occur, a move that is tantamount to limiting how future scholarly work in these areas can and will take place.
It is increasingly common for scholars in humanities disciplines to incorporate data collection and analysis into their research process. As digital humanists produce GIS data, annotated texts and concordances, image libraries, and other output, a new genre of scholarly product is being created. Because it is still relatively new, and because many universities are still struggling with how to give credit for this work alongside the traditional published channels of scholarly communication, we are only now beginning to take the long view. Who is maintaining the scholar’s data? What happens to a project when the scholar leaves the institution? How can the scholar ensure permanent, stable access to their data for current and future researchers?