Making History Podcast: The Blog

October 8, 2008

This Computer is Finished: The Physical Requirements of Writing History

Filed under: research, writing — adamarenson @ 6:02 pm
Tags: , , ,

This computer is finished. Its silver casing shows the years of scratches, bumps, and smudges. It bears the scars of balancing one too many books, of leaving the computer too casually on an ottoman, of eating and working feverishly for a deadline.

On the console, paint is worn away and dirt permanently applied. Unexplained keystrokes are not unknown. Above the hard drive, the metal is warped away from the rubber lining, so that one more spill could spell calamity. Where the power cord connects, the metal is so misshapen that the charger must be threaded into place, as it fits only one way. Even then it glows an angry, unforgiving red-orange—it’s not described in any manual, but so far it has not meant a total cessation of function. And of course these problems aren’t covered by the warranty, which has expired now anyway.

But, then again, this computer is finished. Despite aged software and questionable printer drivers, despite an overloaded hard drive that no longer communicates directly with its backup, my computer has completed its mission. Purchased in May 2005, on the cusp of my dissertation research, it organized archival trips, stored thousands of digital photographs, held hundreds of document transcriptions, and facilitated dozens of drafts. Never lost, never stolen, never broke down, it has survived. The goal has been reached—the dissertation is completed, printed, filed—and so the computer is done. Its gleaming replacement, upon which the dissertation will become a book and the next projects will be born, sits quietly in the box, waiting.

Serious writing demands its own environment, its requirements exacting but replicable. For me, that means sunlight and a vista with distance, however drab; the promise of regular, extended periods of silence; the space to pace; a chair supportive enough but not too hard on the muscles; the screen raised to the proper height; easy access to books on the shelves and files in the cabinet; and a tap for water within reach—but not so close as to bring the clatter of the kitchen pipes. At the center sits the computer, the keyboard angled correctly, the mouse movements registering on the screen. To work best, it should all stay arranged, so that scant writing time can be devoted to writing, not setup or packing up, not searching for files or wondering when that banging will stop. For the system to work best, it should go unnoticed for days at a time. And so it did.

And so, after these three years, when the laptop has finished its tasks and stands ready for replacement, I do notice.

These are the last words to be typed before the awkward process of file transfer commences. Under the inglorious name “Things I Need,” the folder of older items will migrate into unfamiliar territory. And a new computer, with a new name, will start a new relationship with me and my academic work, with the case unscratched, the keys undirtied, and the quirks as yet undiscovered.

I have been grandiose in my name choices. There was Nehemiah, who kept the visions of the prophet Ezra recorded; then Blue, reflecting a mood and the color of the curving iMac plastic, but also the possibilities of a jazz sensibility; then Be My Yoko, a play on an early project name (“One Night Only,” or ONO, for short), and reflecting the wish of The Barenaked Ladies’s chorus: You can be my Yoko Ono / You can follow me wherever I go—an excellent goal for valuable possessions, and especially a work laptop.

The new computer has a university bar code and the standard-issue name “Macintosh HD.” Changing it will renew my compact with another machine. It will maintain order and process queries while I get back to the process of writing history without thought to such physical requirements.  For that, once again, I will be thankful.

July 11, 2008

Confessions of a Blogger Historian

Filed under: deep thoughts, writing — Jana @ 4:27 pm
Tags: , ,

I’ve been blogging nearly every day for five years. I find it seductive. Each day I experiment with trying to tell a tale in staccato style. Punctuation, backstory, and truth are less important than the story of the moment. Hyperlinks and parentheticals flesh out some detail. At times the writing is purposefully obtuse as a nod to my in-group of readers.

licking thoreau

Getting a taste of history

Then there’s the seduction of constant navel-gazing. My readers seem to find me (and my self-absorbed stories) fascinating enough to return regularly (read: HUGE ego-boost). In meatspace I’m a fairly straightlaced and nondescript Mom living in the suburbs of the OC. On the blog I’m crass, cranky and quirky.

Yet what I find the most seductive about blogging is the continued experimentation. It’s a challenge to find something new to say every day and to find new ways of saying it (especially when my life is just a mundane mix of grad school, parenting, and spiritual seeking–it’s hard to imagine more boring story fodder). So I have to think about how best to ‘hook’ my readers, how to provoke a response, and how to write with such skill that my posts are linked by larger blogs.

Now that I’m addicted to blogging, I wonder how it will affect my professional life. Though I’m a few years from facing the job market, I can’t help my think that search committees might be put-off by my flower photos and rambling observations. Often I vow to stop blogging and focus my time on more legitimate academic pursuits (just think, people, of all the book reviews I could be writing instead of blogging!).

But then I consider this: Blogging lubricates my writing muscles. Pounding out a two paragraph post during my morning latte primes me for a day of historical inquiry. I’ve also learned plenty about the technical back-end of digital humanities that I wouldn’t have otherwise encountered. Creating a website? Easy. Putting together a podcast? Not too hard. Adopting new technologies for research? Not much of a learning curve.

the fam

Additionally, as a historian with interests in disability studies and radical feminism, blogging offers a groundbreaking platform for grassroots political activism and community-creation. On both of these fronts, I am convinced that we are making history with each blogpost.

Right now job-market uncertainties seem too far away to sweat about whether to continue sharing my shameful confessions. Yet for many months now I’ve kept my writing here on MHP fairly professional and dispassionate (read: dry). I’ve decided that it’s time to have a bit more fun so I can keep my continued interest in the podcast and blog. I hope you’ll come along for the ride and take the risk to jump in and leave a few comments, or even volunteer to join in the fray by contributing a guest post or a podcast interview.

Subscribe to the Making History Podcast

January 23, 2008

Episode 3, Part 2: Jeff Wasserstrom

cover
This MHP episode offers an informal interview with China historian Jeff Wasserstrom, where he discusses a variety of topics about writing history. He gives advice on publishing book reviews, overcoming writer’s block, and names some of his favorite history books. Jeff also speaks about the Writing History seminar he led at UC Irvine this past Fall.

Links to some of Jeff’s favorite reads:

Wasserstrom’s latest book, China’s Brave New World, was featured on a list of Pankaj Mishra’s favorite books of 2007. Mishra writes, “In this book Jeffrey Wasserstrom shows why he is one of the most sensible writers on a subject that most Western writers spoil with either paranoia or excessive awe.” Jeff is also a member of The China Beat blog team.

Stay tuned for next week’s episode of MHP with Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, AHA president-elect and author of Well-Behaved Women Seldom Make History.

December 25, 2007

Episode 2, Part 2: Martha Hodes

Sea Captain's Wife paperback cover This episode offers a candid discussion with Martha Hodes about the background for her latest book, her daily writing practices, her teaching of experimental history in the classroom, and some advice to graduate students about ‘finding the story’ in their dissertation topics.

Martha mentions some books that she recommends as inspiration for writing:

Erskine Clark, Dwelling Place
Clare Messud, The Emperor’s Children
Stephen Carter, New England White
Daniel Mendelsohn, The Lost: A Search for Six of Six Million

Some questions for discussion:

  • Martha says that she finds much of her writing inspiration from fiction. Do you find inspiration from fiction? If so, what books would you recommend to other writers?
  • When conducting your own research, do you find yourself looking for good stories to tell?
  • She notes that in The Sea Captain’s Wife she leaves out the sentence that says “I argue that…” because she feels that the argument is evident from the historical narrative. Do you, in your own writing, find the need to explicitly spell out your argument for your readers or do you find that you can write in a manner that makes the argument obvious?

In this episode Martha discusses her undergraduate class in “Experimental History.” This previous post links to her Perspectives article on this topic and offers links to the books and articles that she uses in the classroom.

December 22, 2007

Episode 2, Part 1: Martha Hodes

Filed under: books, history, podcast, writing — Jana @ 9:40 pm
Tags: , , ,

book coverThis episode of Making History Podcast features historian Martha Hodes reading excerpts from her book The Sea Captain’s Wife: A True Story of Love, Race, and War in the Nineteenth Century.

Following her reading, Martha discusses various stylistic choices she made in writing the narrative of Eunice’s life. Of particular interest are her thoughts about telling a “true” story.

Some questions for discussion:

  • What part of this reading resonates most strongly with you?
  • How do you feel about Martha’s discussion of the choices she made in quoting from Eunice’s letters?
  • In what ways does telling the story of a remarkable figure like Eunice–a woman who married across the color line– help us to better understand the lives of other women in the nineteenth century?
  • Will Martha’s example impact your own history writing? If so, how?

Note: click here to listen to this episode of Making History Podcast or subscribe to the feed for MH podcast.
Next Monday Part 2 of this podcast will be posted. Stay Tuned!

    November 13, 2007

    “Writing History” Seminar: Studying the craft of historical writing

    This quarter I’m taking a seminar called “Writing History” with Jeffrey Wasserstrom, author of China’s Brave New World. The aim of the class (from the syllabus) is to “explore the qualities of historical writing as writing and to see whether doing so can help those taking the class become better, or at least more versatile, authors of pieces about the past.”
    Some questions that we are addressing via the readings:

    • How do those writing about the past convey what they have learned and the arguments they want to make?
    • What rhetorical devices do they use to try to enlighten, capture the attention of, provoke, persuade, or even amuse their reader?
    • Why do we think of some academic historians as especially good stylists or practitioners of the craft of historical writing?
    • What place, if any, should there be in non-fiction historical writing for techniques and approaches more often associated with one or another genre of fiction?
    • Why do some book reviews stick with us while others are immediately forgettable?

    Below are the texts that we’re reading for the seminar (with hyperlinks). The books were all paired with relevant readings on the class syllabus. However, for ease of posting here, I’ve disrupted the connections and chronology. Many apologies to Jeff in this regard.

    It’s my hope that this list, and other material at the Making History site, will be a catalyst for future classes on the craft of writing history, particularly experimental history:

    Books:

    Robert Darnton’s The Great Cat Massacre
    Vanessa Schwartz’ Spectacular Realities
    Erik Larson’s Devil in the White City
    Mary Beard’s The Parthenon
    Natalie Z. Davis’ The Return of Martin Guerre
    Jonathan Spence’s The Death of Woman Wang
    Lynn Hunt’s Inventing Human Rights
    Amartya Sen’s The Argumentative Indian
    Perry Anderson’s Spectrum

    Articles:

    Urban History, “Icons” issue multimedia companion
    Mike Davis’ “The Flames of New York”
    Jane Kamensky’s “Our Buildings, Our Selves
    Laura Mitchell’s “Beyond Tense: Encouraging Historians to Think Hard about Writing and Reading
    Martha Hodes’ “A House in Vermont, a Caribbean Beach: Beckoned by landscapes beyond the archive
    Jon Wiener’s “The Weatherman’s Temptation
    Mary Beard’s “A Don’s Life” blogposts
    Hanchao Lu’s “The Art of History: A Conversation with Jonathan Spence
    Greg Grandin’s “Toward a Global New Deal
    Jill Lepore’s “No More Kings
    Martha Nussbaum’s “Body of the Nation
    Pankaj Mishra’s “Impasse in India

    Blog at WordPress.com.